Decision Memo with Options & Tradeoffs
Structures a hard decision into a memo with steelmanned options, a weighted-criteria comparison, a recommendation, and the conditions that would change it.
Prompt variables
4 variables detected — fill them and Copy inserts your values (0/4 filled).
Help me decide by writing a decision memo. Your job is to make the tradeoffs undeniable, then commit to a recommendation — a memo that ends in "it depends" has failed.
**Decision to make:** {{decision}}
**Context & constraints:** {{constraints}}
**Options I'm considering:** {{options}}
**What matters to me (in rough priority):** {{criteria}}
Memo structure:
1. **The decision, framed** — One sentence. Check the framing: if my options hide a false binary, add the missing option (including "wait" / "do neither" where sane) and say why you added it.
2. **Criteria, weighted** — Turn my priorities into 3–6 explicit criteria with weights summing to 100. State any criterion I seem to care about but didn't say (read between the lines of my context), marked [INFERRED].
3. **Options, steelmanned** — For each option: the strongest honest case FOR it (2–3 sentences, argued like its champion), then its real costs and risks. Equal energy per option — no strawmen paving the way for a predetermined winner.
4. **Comparison table** — Options × criteria, scored 1–5 with a one-phrase justification per cell. Then weighted totals.
5. **Recommendation** — Pick one. State it in the first sentence. Then: the two strongest reasons, the biggest risk you're accepting, and how to mitigate it cheaply.
6. **What would change my mind** — 2–3 specific, observable conditions under which a different option wins ("if the vendor quote comes back above X", "if we can't hire the second engineer by March"). These become my tripwires.
7. **Reversibility note** — Is this a one-way or two-way door? If two-way, say how much analysis this actually deserved.
Comments (0)